trend_meanreversion
23 Dec 2015, 15:20

RE: RE:

I am soon going to provide link to myfxbook link where i have been running CFD bot from Dec. Hoping it to perform the way it has done in last couple of months...Stay tuned !

trend_meanreversion
20 Dec 2015, 23:30

RE:

trend_meanreversion said:

Hi ,

Anyone interested in Binary Options strategy having 60-65% accuracy ? 

I will provide backtest if someone is interested. It generates very few trades across 10 mins and 15 mins tenor but works perfectly across the several pairs. You can use it on brokers ( regulated ) with 75-80% payouts.

Please contact me if interested at "trend_meanreversion@yahoo.com"

 

 

I have uploaded link to backtest file here -> http://www.filedropper.com/binaryoptionsmodel

trend_meanreversion
20 Dec 2015, 06:50

RE:

ironmine said:

>> showing for 1K balance as 2K is not an option in Calgo back testing

You can manually type in this field ("starting capital") any number you need.

Thanks Ironmine. I wasn't aware of it.

trend_meanreversion
18 Dec 2015, 13:55

RE: RE: RE:

stetrimo said:

Selling the robot will make more money than using it?

Strend_meanreversion said:

hichem said:

This is very good.

How much is the price of this Robot ?

Please can you contact me at "trend_meanreversion@yahoo.com"

 

I don't think so that selling would make more money than actually using it(which i am doing in any case), but definitely it will be an additional income.

trend_meanreversion
18 Dec 2015, 00:32

RE:

hichem said:

This is very good.

How much is the price of this Robot ?

Please can you contact me at "trend_meanreversion@yahoo.com"

trend_meanreversion
17 Dec 2015, 15:54 ( Updated at: 21 Dec 2023, 09:20 )

RE: RE:

hichem said:

Hello,

There some things that need to be clarified before trying to sell a Robot:

1. In a demo account rarely you see a request being rejected or failed to be sent.

How does your robot handle failed requests sent to the broker ? Does it auto retry ?

2. The initial Balance in your backtests is $10000, I would like to see backtests with initial balance of $2000

Keep the good work.

 

trend_meanreversion said:

Hi Everyone,

I have recently built a bot in cAlgo which is showing promising results in back testing using tick data and no martingaling. It works best with AUDUSD (as i was able to detect an unique pattern)  and i have been testing it in live environment with very similar results.

I have one more bot on an Index CFD, again with tick data back testing results with no martingaling which is also live with very similar results as in back testing. Please find the back-testing results of them below.

Both of these bots are realistic and have high risk reward as i always seek at least 2 or 3:1 annualized return to max DD  .  This allows one to leverage if needed without blowing their accounts within limited risk appetite.

---

From 19 Jan 2014 - 15 Dec 2015

Total Return : 30%

Max DD : 6%

---

 

From 19 Jan 2014 - 15 Dec 2015

Total Return : 47%

Max DD : 6%

 

---

If anyone is interested in them, then please contact me "trend_meanreversion@yahoo.com"

 

 

 

1. In a demo account rarely you see a request being rejected or failed to be sent.

How does your robot handle failed requests sent to the broker ? Does it auto retry ?

Currently it doesn't because i haven't seen any failures with my broker . If you have a reliable broker then it shouldn't be an issue, but i still feel you have a valid point. I can easily adjust that condition in my code.

2. The initial Balance in your backtests is $10000, I would like to see backtests with initial balance of $2000

It wouldn't matter what is your balance size as there is no martingale. Your return vs max DD % will remain same. But here you go for the first bot ( on AUDUSD ) [ showing for 1K balance as 2K is not an option in Calgo back testing ]. Since DD is 6% , you can leverage upto lets say 3 times and get 90% return with 18% DD.

Keep the good work. -> Thanks for the appreciation.

trend_meanreversion
17 Dec 2015, 15:24

RE:

GS66 said:

Are you trying to sell or discuss?

Market conditions change frequently. That's not an universal Algo that can profit anyway. When it's a range phase play start with a range bot. Stop it during high volatilty. When it's a trending phase, medium averages or breakout will gives your profit anyway, but an universal bot that can profit forever in any market condition is not a double goals.

Just my 2 cents

Thanks for your reply GS66. I do agree that there is nothing universal in this trading business and markets do change. But there are some anomalies which are statistically proven to exist like trend and mean reversion across the products and asset classes. I am trying to exploit those through my bots. I have also worked on regime detection techniques to find out the ranging markets vs trending markets but i haven't been successful in making money out of them yet. Unfortunately, i haven't seen any successful bot in retail space which offers reliable results with high risk reward with no martingale and that's why i feel my bots are probably superior than others ( but again not every successful algo will be revealed in the market so there must be some silent players )

In any case, to answer your question -> Yes i am trying to sell these bots

Obvious question would be why ? ( given they are so good  )

1) I am thinking i can earn a little extra from them by providing monthly/yearly/life time access.

2) I am making money from these bots and hopefully will continue to do so . Also, i am the one who knows the algorithm, so probably i can extract more from them as i learn more from these markets.

3) I think of it as a business and thus offering them is one avenue of revenue. I am also thinking of  account management based on these algos where i might charge 30% of profits.

I am not trying to hide anything here. If anyone is interested, feel free to ask questions or contact me directly.

trend_meanreversion
07 Dec 2015, 04:20

RE:

megamemo said:

Hi im guillermo correa, i have more then 5 years fighting in fx, and i must said that i really love this market, and i spend ridicoulys, sickenning hours here, (12 or more) and not until, i findit something pretty amazing i would not stop it!.

And i did  (i finally  did it),i create a system that if am honest pal, is really profitable and really low risk.

But if am honet am searching for somebody to helpme to code it .

And if am honest, it have to be someone that understand that selling this, the only thing that would happen if that your going to loose the chance from profit from it !(as a money manager).

And thats the reason because the big guys are like the mafia.

Another thing is i need someone who is open minded, because this is everything but normal.

And if im honest is really profitable imagine it 24/7.

Off course i can provide you evidence and im going to give priority, to the guys that have more time here then the newbiees!.

please talk to me on my mail burnigonhell@gmail.com.

Hi guillermo,i would like to extend my help but before that i would like to see some facts/evidence about the algo. I am not super experienced but if it is upto my ally, i won't mind exploring it in cAlgo.

I am reachable at trend_meanreversion@yahoo.com

trend_meanreversion
07 Dec 2015, 03:31

RE:

mioulianou said:

Thanks for the response,

my algo is based in tick data movement of price and all i do is from tick data (backtest and real time test) . However i still have different results!

Well in that case, it really depends on the algorithm but i can think of 2 possible causes:

1) Tick backtesting would assume that you get the same tick(or probably next tick) while execution but in real-time there will delay between OnTick calculation and 'real' execution tick which can be a couple of milliseconds away. This could cause serious impact to strategies that rely on StopOrders or work during high volatility regime.

2) Tick data(assuming your strategy works on FX) is basically top line liquidity of broker (with volume) but not 'necessarily' valid trading quote. So you might be hitting the market order on next Tick in back-testing which could give you the price but in real-time you might not get that fill but probably the next one which is worse than expected. ( I think you probably know about it ..look at 'Last Look' feature in FX pricing )

I feel the first reason is more probable than second for reliable brokers. Also, i am assuming you have put in proper commissions value while back testing in tick mode.

trend_meanreversion
06 Dec 2015, 10:12

RE:

mioulianou said:

hi! I am testing my algo for 2 weeks in real time testing mode. However when i try this 2 week in backtesting mode i do not get the same results. Why? 

thnks

my 2 cents on the issue you are facing ( as i have faced similar issue before )

There are a couple of reasons why one might (and most likely) have different results in backtesting vs real-time results

It depends on your algorithm but if you have backtested using 1-min or any other time frame testing assuming candlestick OHLC to be sufficient for backtesting then i am almost 100% sure that you will have different results . You should backtest using 'tick' data and that should be "closest" to what you should expect in real-time. For example : you might have takeProfit and StopLoss in your algo and in real time you will get the tick based price while in backtesting you will have candlestick OHLC to get the triggers to simulate your SL/TP. This could lead to significant difference ( and in most cases very poor ) in results. 

trend_meanreversion
12 Jul 2015, 11:47

RE:

hichem said:

Hello, 

I have finally finished testing my trading Robot (6 months of daily testing) and it is ready to run on real account.

 

My issue is that I don't have totality of the the minimum required amount which is 2000€. So I decided to post on this forum to see if there are investors who might be interested to invest with me.

 

To whom interested I'm ready to provide a test version of the robot + backtests.

 

Best regards.

 

Why don't you post test version of robot + full backtest ( tick data preferable ) and then people will be able to appreciate your bot and probably help you raising money ? ( I could be one of them )

trend_meanreversion
02 Jul 2015, 04:35

I don't know much about mq4 coding but have you tried http://2calgo.com/

trend_meanreversion
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 ( Updated at: 19 Mar 2025, 08:57 )

RE: RE: RE:

Spotware said:

trend_meanreversion said:

Spotware said:

Dear Trader,

Please send the information to support@ctrader.com

Hi Spotware team,  i have sent snapshots to you but support@ctrader.com is not a valid email ID( as i am getting mail delivery message everytime ) so i have sent copy of email to support@ctrader.com as well. Please have an urgent look at the issue and resolve it asap . 

Dear Trader,

Could you please specify more details about the mail delivery message error?

this is the error

We're writing to let you know that the group you tried to contact (troubleshooting) may not exist, or you may not have permission to post messages to the group. A few more details on why you weren't able to post:

 * You might have spelled or formatted the group name incorrectly.
 * The owner of the group may have removed this group.
 * You may need to join the group before receiving permission to post.
 * This group may not be open to posting.

If you have questions related to this or any other Google Group, visit the Help Center at http://support.google.com/a/spotware.com/bin/topic.py?topic=25838.

Thanks,

spotware.com admins


 

trend_meanreversion
13 Jun 2015, 06:57 ( Updated at: 19 Mar 2025, 08:57 )

RE:

Spotware said:

Dear Trader,

Please send the information to support@ctrader.com

Hi Spotware team,  i have sent snapshots to you but support@ctrader.com is not a valid email ID( as i am getting mail delivery message everytime ) so i have sent copy of email to support@ctrader.com as well. Please have an urgent look at the issue and resolve it asap . 

trend_meanreversion
12 Jun 2015, 07:26

RE:

deklin said:

When backting a cBot, this seems to always return the current time and date:

DateTime.Now.ToString("HH:mm - MM/dd/yyyy") 

How can I get it to return the time and date of the backtested event?

Hi mate, normally i use Server.Time to get the time during the historical events in backtesting. You can see one simpleBot i created which dumps High and Low Time of a bar historically which is using server.Time class ( /algos/cbots/show/864 ) . Hope it helps.

trend_meanreversion
12 Jun 2015, 07:21

Please provide email ID where i should send you snapshot of issue which i sent to my broker also on 22nd April . 

trend_meanreversion
10 Jun 2015, 13:23

Any updates Spotware team ? Please , provide a resolution to this serious issue as i can't trade Index CFDs on your platform otherwise . 

trend_meanreversion
04 Jun 2015, 16:07

Don't bother about it guys. I think i figured it out. I will post my code by creating a robot which will save OHLC ( Bid/Ask ) , IsHighFirstFlag , HighTime, LowTime in a file.

trend_meanreversion
29 May 2015, 09:54

Just my initial cents to your initial query : 

As far as my understanding goes, OnBar() is triggered on the first tick of a new bar(unfinished) so at that time you will have Open=High=Close=Low=LastValue=CurrentTickValue . So conceptually it is returning the correct numbers but if you are interested in OHLC of previous bar ( completed ) bar then you should use Last(1) to retrieve OHLC values.

trend_meanreversion
23 May 2015, 16:23 ( Updated at: 18 Mar 2019, 09:05 )

RE: RE:

MZen said:

Hi,

how to get access to ticks Market Data in non-tick time frames indicators?

Thank you

 

Spotware said:

I also need to get access to tick data in let's say timeFrame 15 mins indicator ? please help us.