Topics
Forum Topics not found
Replies
jallopy
09 Dec 2013, 11:25
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE:
A question for support, I don't want to re-invent the wheel.
If I wanted to close 25% of a position, 4 times, the first iteration, is explanatory, however the 2nd 25% would be calculated on the new size, not on the original order size, same for the 3rd and 4th, ever dimension amounts.
Is there a way to reference the original order size, to avoid this? Is this a case for getting the original volume and storing it in a positions label/property, to reference later?. So if the bot is stopped and started it can reference the original order size? Or a label to state stage 2/4 or 3 of 4, so the bot knows where it is in the process.
jallopy said:
Total Awesome Dude.
Cerunnos said:
jallopy said:
Has it yet?
cAlgo_Fanatic said:
jallopy said:
Hi Admin,
Is this implemented yet, could you give and example code for closing , for example , 25% of an open position?
Thank-you
admin said:
There will be an implementation for it very soon.
This feature has not been implemented yet.
@jallopy
jallopy
06 Dec 2013, 18:11
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE:
Total Awesome Dude.
Cerunnos said:
jallopy said:
Has it yet?
cAlgo_Fanatic said:
jallopy said:
Hi Admin,
Is this implemented yet, could you give and example code for closing , for example , 25% of an open position?
Thank-you
admin said:
There will be an implementation for it very soon.
This feature has not been implemented yet.
@jallopy
jallopy
06 Dec 2013, 12:36
RE: RE: RE:
Has it yet?
cAlgo_Fanatic said:
jallopy said:
Hi Admin,
Is this implemented yet, could you give and example code for closing , for example , 25% of an open position?
Thank-you
admin said:
There will be an implementation for it very soon.
This feature has not been implemented yet.
@jallopy
jallopy
20 Jul 2014, 11:34
I also have this issue.
if I edit in calgo, and return to vstudio , vstudio states the source code has changed do you want to refresh. However edit in vstudio, nothing appears in calgo until the restart.
In the YouTube demo it seems to work.
thanks.
@jallopy