Topics
Replies
raul_gherman
13 Aug 2024, 16:01
seems demo environment has version 92 deployed:
2024-08-12 16:42:54.995733 0ms INFO tokio-runtime-worker [src/process_message_stream.rs:108] ProtoOaVersionRes {
payload_type: None,
version: "92",
}
still, TRADING_BAD_STOPS
error returns the same:
2024-08-13 05:00:39.064768 0ms ERROR tokio-runtime-worker [src/process_message_stream.rs:187] ProtoOaOrderErrorEvent {
payload_type: None,
ctid_trader_account_id: 40xxxxx2,
error_code: "TRADING_BAD_STOPS",
order_id: Some(
0,
),
position_id: Some(
0,
),
description: Some(
"New TP for SELL position should be <= current ASK price. current ASK: 0.52324, TP: 0.52335",
),
}
@raul_gherman
raul_gherman
13 Aug 2024, 16:01
seems demo environment has version 92 deployed:
2024-08-12 16:42:54.995733 0ms INFO tokio-runtime-worker [src/process_message_stream.rs:108] ProtoOaVersionRes {
payload_type: None,
version: "92",
}
still, TRADING_BAD_STOPS
error returns the same:
2024-08-13 05:00:39.064768 0ms ERROR tokio-runtime-worker [src/process_message_stream.rs:187] ProtoOaOrderErrorEvent {
payload_type: None,
ctid_trader_account_id: 40xxxxx2,
error_code: "TRADING_BAD_STOPS",
order_id: Some(
0,
),
position_id: Some(
0,
),
description: Some(
"New TP for SELL position should be <= current ASK price. current ASK: 0.52324, TP: 0.52335",
),
}
@raul_gherman
raul_gherman
01 Aug 2024, 13:12
( Updated at: 01 Aug 2024, 18:18 )
… duplicate post, I suppose…
@raul_gherman
raul_gherman
01 Aug 2024, 13:12
( Updated at: 01 Aug 2024, 13:13 )
here is another interesting (yet I think related) one:
2024-08-01 11:00:02.817977 0ms ERROR tokio-runtime-worker [src/process_message_stream.rs:204] ProtoOaOrderErrorEvent {
payload_type: None,
ctid_trader_account_id: 40xxxx09,
error_code: "CONCURRENT_MODIFICATION",
order_id: Some(
0,
),
position_id: Some(
0,
),
description: None,
}
returning CONCURRENT_MODIFICATION
in ProtoOaErrorEvent is correct, still order_id
and / or position_id
fields should be filled up;
processing an order / position request should result in either a ProtoOaExecutionreport in case of successful processing operation, or a ProtoOaErrorEvent
in case of an insuccessful such operation, mentioning order or position ID and the reason / cause of failure in description
field;
current setup also returns CONCURRENT_MODIFICATION
in error_code
of execution report (sample below), so required data to properly populate necessary fields is already present:
2024-08-01 11:00:01.415653 0ms INFO tokio-runtime-worker [src/symbol/process_execution_event.rs:46] ProtoOaExecutionEvent {
payload_type: None,
ctid_trader_account_id: 40xxxx09,
execution_type: OrderCancelRejected,
position: Some(
ProtoOaPosition {
position_id: 4xxxxxxx2,
trade_data: ProtoOaTradeData {
symbol_id: 2,
volume: 0,
trade_side: Buy,
open_timestamp: None,
label: Some(
"00c7427b60a176ed4fe104d122af0a04",
),
guaranteed_stop_loss: Some(
false,
),
comment: None,
measurement_units: Some(
"GBP",
),
close_timestamp: None,
},
position_status: PositionStatusCreated,
swap: 0,
price: Some(
0.0,
),
stop_loss: None,
take_profit: None,
utc_last_update_timestamp: None,
commission: Some(
0,
),
margin_rate: Some(
0.0,
),
mirroring_commission: Some(
0,
),
guaranteed_stop_loss: Some(
false,
),
used_margin: Some(
2552,
),
stop_loss_trigger_method: None,
money_digits: Some(
2,
),
trailing_stop_loss: None,
},
),
order: Some(
ProtoOaOrder {
order_id: 7xxxxxxx0,
trade_data: ProtoOaTradeData {
symbol_id: 2,
volume: 1000000,
trade_side: Buy,
open_timestamp: Some(
17xxxxxxx11,
),
label: Some(
"00c7427b60a176ed4fe104d122af0a04",
),
guaranteed_stop_loss: Some(
false,
),
comment: None,
measurement_units: Some(
"GBP",
),
close_timestamp: None,
},
order_type: Limit,
order_status: OrderStatusAccepted,
expiration_timestamp: None,
execution_price: None,
executed_volume: Some(
0,
),
utc_last_update_timestamp: Some(
17xxxxxxx20,
),
base_slippage_price: None,
slippage_in_points: None,
closing_order: Some(
false,
),
limit_price: Some(
1.27648,
),
stop_price: None,
stop_loss: None,
take_profit: None,
client_order_id: Some(
"77b811aa-2464-4e49-b5ed-296731464224",
),
time_in_force: Some(
GoodTillCancel,
),
position_id: Some(
4xxxxxxx2,
),
relative_stop_loss: None,
relative_take_profit: None,
is_stop_out: None,
trailing_stop_loss: None,
stop_trigger_method: None,
},
),
deal: None,
bonus_deposit_withdraw: None,
deposit_withdraw: None,
error_code: Some(
"CONCURRENT_MODIFICATION",
),
is_server_event: Some(
false,
),
}
@raul_gherman
raul_gherman
22 Jul 2024, 11:49
@spotware support, could you please take a look at this topic?
topic raised more than 2 months ago, in the mean time v9.1 was released, issue still relevant.
could you please take a look, or at least reply here that it is going to be addressed or not?
@raul_gherman
raul_gherman
22 Jul 2024, 11:48
@spotware support, could you please take a look at this topic?
topic raised 1.5 months ago, in the mean time v9.1 was released, issue still relevant.
could you please take a look, or at least reply here that it is going to be addressed or not?
@raul_gherman
raul_gherman
06 Jun 2024, 12:03
( Updated at: 06 Jun 2024, 13:53 )
@PanagiotisCharalampous could you pls advise on this one?
@raul_gherman
raul_gherman
03 Sep 2024, 08:05
version 92:
@raul_gherman