Walk-Forward testing for cBots/cTrader automate
Walk-Forward testing for cBots/cTrader automate
17 May 2023, 19:11
Is it possible to program a cBot/system to do walk-forward testing for algos on cTrader? Or is Spotware considering adding this feature to the platform in the near future?
Replies
lisandronahuelh
18 May 2023, 16:56
RE: RE:
Yes, I am aware of your proposal and I up-voted it. I just wanted to put it again to raise attention at Spotware. Thanks for your comment.
jim.tollan said:
lisandronahuelhillebrand said:
Is it possible to program a cBot/system to do walk-forward testing for algos on cTrader? Or is Spotware considering adding this feature to the platform in the near future?
yes, i weirdly proposed an approach for this in this thread:
it's definitely a must have in my opinion. might be worth upvoting that thread also, plus adding some further commentary..
@lisandronahuelh
jim.tollan
19 May 2023, 11:01
RE: RE: RE:
lisandronahuelhillebrand said:
Yes, I am aware of your proposal and I up-voted it. I just wanted to put it again to raise attention at Spotware. Thanks for your comment.
jim.tollan said:
lisandronahuelhillebrand said:
Is it possible to program a cBot/system to do walk-forward testing for algos on cTrader? Or is Spotware considering adding this feature to the platform in the near future?
yes, i weirdly proposed an approach for this in this thread:
it's definitely a must have in my opinion. might be worth upvoting that thread also, plus adding some further commentary..
yup -i agree it's well worth keeping it in the spotlight. That said, i have a feeling that not many folk have explored the topic nor realised the advantages of such a feature. This is demonstrated by the low upvote count on the proposal. Of course, it could be that this type of feature has no appeal for the wider audience - hence the lowish upvote count.
I believe our friend The Nomad Trader has also cottoned on to the huge benefits of this and explains in laypersons terms the key benefits:
@jim.tollan
jim.tollan
18 May 2023, 14:32
RE:
lisandronahuelhillebrand said:
yes, i weirdly proposed an approach for this in this thread:
it's definitely a must have in my opinion. might be worth upvoting that thread also, plus adding some further commentary..
@jim.tollan