Description
Paraplane - 2Way High-Frequency cBot
The strategy uses a bi-directional high-frequency trading.
Without the increase the volume, grid and martingale-type systems.
For more information visit
http://www.kratx.com/paraplane
Drawdown depends on the size of the Deposit and some settings
using System;
using System.Linq;
using cAlgo.API;
using cAlgo.API.Indicators;
using cAlgo.API.Internals;
using cAlgo.Indicators;
namespace cAlgo
{
[Robot(TimeZone = TimeZones.UTC, AccessRights = AccessRights.FullAccess)]
public class PARAPLANEBlank : Robot
{
[Parameter(DefaultValue = 0.0)]
public double Parameter { get; set; }
protected override void OnStart()
{
ChartObjects.DrawText("AlgoDeveloper", "Please look at this cBot from Kratx.com", StaticPosition.Center, Colors.Red);
}
protected override void OnTick()
{
// Put your core logic here
}
protected override void OnStop()
{
}
}
}
KRATX.COM
Joined on 01.01.2017
- Distribution: Paid
- Language: C#
- Trading platform: cTrader Automate
- File name: PARAPLANE Blank.algo
- Rating: 0
- Installs: 2422
Comments
If algorithmic trading was all a hoax then what are we all here for? I won't discredit kratx completely he is sincere and at least he is 60% correct the rest is your own risk
Just buy the source code to answer your question and encourage the developer, he's made something that has potential at least
Been a month, surely the Bot must have gained a substantial sum on the live account that you promised to show us.
with time all will do, stay tuned
a regular lot - I meant permanent, systematic, periodic, constant .....
You are the one that wrote regular lot, I quote "since this test is not weighted the risks is trading a regular lot and 1000 Deposit". I got this to be a standard lot, if not then its my mistake.
So you are saying that this has not been tested live yet? Then please open a live account and connect it to myfxbook, so all here can see that it works as you state it does.
Just looking out for the small guys that believe in getting rich quick here, if that were through then there would be atleast 1000 billionares here on this forum.
Volume constant yes, but the drawdown isnt. You only get max equity drawdown in the test, try starting your system before a known drawdown period with $1000 and trading a standard lot.
- settings it is possible to trade differently, but to trade the 1 lot for a$ 1000 Deposit that's cool, this system does not imply such trade
As you can curvfit a backtest to look better, you can also do the same to show the worse.
- of course for this and make bots
With the results you show, I dont really understand why you arent a billionare yet with a profit factor over 21000 and a max equity drawdown of 15%.
- just the algorithm we have implemented recently
Im guessing the average win of $0.66 says it all when trading a standard lot. Slippage and requotes in the real world will kill it, not to talk about feed loss and minor currency crashes.
- where did you get this information ? trading order 0.01, as you suggested, again, missed the movement in a single trade at times more
Show us a live account that has survived over 1 year with a smaller drawdown than the initial deposit.
- how will this history will publish
+ Wondering what and to whom you prove? Here, no one owes nothing to. But we like that you follow our development. Good luck!
Volume constant yes, but the drawdown isnt. You only get max equity drawdown in the test, try starting your system before a known drawdown period with $1000 and trading a standard lot. As you can curvfit a backtest to look better, you can also do the same to show the worse.
With the results you show, I dont really understand why you arent a billionare yet with a profit factor over 21000 and a max equity drawdown of 15%.
Im guessing the average win of $0.66 says it all when trading a standard lot. Slippage and requotes in the real world will kill it, not to talk about feed loss and minor currency crashes.
Show us a live account that has survived over 1 year with a smaller drawdown than the initial deposit.
This test shows the behavior of the algorithm and not profitability, since this test is not weighted the risks is trading a regular lot and 1000 Deposit, try to assume that Deposit more than 10 times that the system will also stop working ? Volume here constant ! Look at the test below as you ?
The system is developed.
The important thing is what choices to make?! To trade and to risk or not to risk and not to trade ....
Sadly some developers are really not interested in anything else then sell their product, even if the strategy doesnt work. Like throwing candy on a dogshit and calling it a cake, then convincing people to buy it.
Take a look at the backtest chart above, between trade 11000 and 13000 there is a drowdown of 4000$. Starting with 1000$ as they have in their test, but at that time instead you would have blown the account. It happens a couple of other times too during their test.
By adding equity based lots instead you will get a more correct backtest, risking the same amount on every trade according to what you have in your account. This way, the cBot in question wouldent even survive a month or two.
That said, backtest cant really prove anything more then past performance anyway.
If only developers where more transparent we may be able to collabratively improve the bot..
Why? You dont want everybody here to see the strategys weakness?
Please send questions to welcome@kratx.com
Add equitybased lots, else the backtest isnt reliable.
what pair this bot can run on?
Any demo version available?
Has anyone tried Kratx cbots on a real account? Could you share an experience.